4.5 Article

Circulatory efficiency in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis before and after aortic valve replacement

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12968-020-00686-0

关键词

Circulatory efficiency; Aortic valve stenosis; Heart failure; Aortic valve replacement; Remodeling; Hemodynamics

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [031A427A]
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG) (Berlin, Germany) [GO1067/6-1-KU1329/10-1]
  3. DFG
  4. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that circulatory efficiency is significantly reduced in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS), and most patients experience a significant increase in circulatory efficiency after aortic valve replacement (AVR). However, a subset of patients still have reduced circulatory efficiency post-AVR, with less reduction in myocardial fibrosis volume compared to those with restored circulatory efficiency.
Background Circulatory efficiency reflects the ratio between total left ventricular work and the work required for maintaining cardiovascular circulation. The effect of severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) and aortic valve replacement (AVR) on left ventricular/circulatory mechanical power and efficiency is not yet fully understood. We aimed to quantify left ventricular (LV) efficiency in patients with severe AS before and after surgical AVR. Methods Circulatory efficiency was computed from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging derived volumetric data, echocardiographic and clinical data in patients with severe AS (n = 41) before and 4 months after AVR and in age and sex-matched healthy subjects (n = 10). Results In patients with AS circulatory efficiency was significantly decreased compared to healthy subjects (9 +/- 3% vs 12 +/- 2%; p = 0.004). There were significant negative correlations between circulatory efficiency and LV myocardial mass (r = - 0.591, p < 0.001), myocardial fibrosis volume (r = - 0.427, p = 0.015), end systolic volume (r = - 0.609, p < 0.001) and NT-proBNP (r = - 0.444, p = 0.009) and significant positive correlation between circulatory efficiency and LV ejection fraction (r = 0.704, p < 0.001). After AVR, circulatory efficiency increased significantly in the total cohort (9 +/- 3 vs 13 +/- 5%; p < 0.001). However, in 10/41 (24%) patients, circulatory efficiency remained below 10% after AVR and, thus, did not restore to normal values. These patients also showed less reduction in myocardial fibrosis volume compared to patients with restored circulatory efficiency after AVR. Conclusion In our cohort, circulatory efficiency is reduced in patients with severe AS. In 76% of cases, AVR leads to normalization of circulatory efficiency. However, in 24% of patients, circulatory efficiency remained below normal values even after successful AVR. In these patients also less regression of myocardial fibrosis volume was seen. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT03172338, June 1, 2017, retrospectively registered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据