4.3 Article

How trust leads to online purchase intention founded in perceived usefulness and peer communication

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 1297-1312

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cb.1936

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the factors on social media that influence the intention to purchase fashion-related products, focusing on the role of trust. Findings suggest that the perceived usefulness of a brand's social media is influenced by atmospheric cues, and peer communication also impacts trust levels and purchase intention.
This study seeks to understand the specific factors on social media that help drive the intention to purchase fashion-related products, focusing on the central role of trust. The unique contribution of this research lies in its exploration of the interplay between perceived usefulness of the fashion brand's social media and peer communication on the fashion brand's social media in driving trust in the fashion brand's social media and, ultimately, purchase intention. Theoretically, we combine the technology acceptance model and consumer socialisation theory to explore the mediating role of trust in a rapidly expanding and growing industry sector. In surveying 150 Europeans to test our hypotheses around the aforementioned concepts, findings show that the perceived usefulness of a brand's social media is impacted by a set of atmospheric cues, and it influences the level of trust in both the fashion brand and its social media channels. Peer communication also influences perceived usefulness and level of trust in both the fashion brand and its social media channels. Trust in the brand but not its social media channels impacts purchase intention. The role of privacy concerns is limited in our model. We draw implications for theory around combining consumer socialisation theory and the technology acceptance model and for managers around parallel strategies to build different sets of trust on social media.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据