4.4 Review

Recent advances on polymeric hydrogels as wound dressings

期刊

APL BIOENGINEERING
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0038364

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21725403, 21935011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogels are attracting intensive attention for their high porosity, good biocompatibility, and beneficial properties for wound healing. Traditional hemostasis methods have limitations, while hydrogel dressings offer more advantages. Future research and development should focus on overcoming the challenges of hydrogel dressings and improving their performance and applications.
Severe hemorrhage is a leading cause of high mortality in critical situations like disaster, accidents, and warfare. The resulting wounds could induce severe physical and psychological trauma to patients and also bring an immense socio-economic burden. Hence, rapid hemostasis and wound healing techniques have become critical initiatives for life-saving treatment. Although traditional methods relying on bandages and gauzes are effective in controlling hemorrhage, they suffer from several limitations: nonbiodegradability, being susceptible to infection, being unsuitable for the irregular wound, secondary tissue damage, and being almost ineffective for wound healing. Owing to the merits of high porosity, good biocompatibility, tunable physicochemical properties, and being beneficial for wound healing, hydrogels with excellent performance have drawn intensive attention and numerous novel effective hydrogel dressings have been widely developed. In this Review, after introducing some commonly used strategies for the synthesis of hydrogels, the most recent progress on polymer-based hydrogels as wound dressings is discussed. Particularly, their hemostasis, antibacterial, and biodegradation properties are introduced. Finally, challenges and future perspectives about the development of hydrogels for wound dressings are outlined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据