4.6 Article

GABARAP suppresses EMT and breast cancer progression via the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway

期刊

AGING-US
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 5858-5874

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC

关键词

GABARAP; breast cancer; EMT; prognosis; AKT/mTOR pathway

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81773295, 81573001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study revealed the inhibitory effect of GABARAP on malignant behaviors in breast cancer through the AKT/mTOR pathway. Low levels of GABARAP were associated with advanced clinicopathological features and poor prognosis of breast cancer patients.
Few studies have focused on gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor-associated protein (GABARAP) in tumor progression. We investigated the expression and importance of GABARAP in breast cancer. We analyzed the expression of GABARAP and its relationship with clinicopathological features and prognosis (TCGA). To explain the role and potential mechanism of GABARAP in regulating tumor development, we performed acquisition and loss of function experiments using cell lines and models of mouse xenotransplantation. We found that GABARAP inhibited proliferation, migration and invasion in vitro and in vivo. Notably, low levels of GABARAP induced the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Low levels of GABARAP increased p-AKT and pmTOR levels, and a specific AKT pathway inhibitor reversed the downregulation of GABARAP-induced tumor progression. GABARAP negatively correlated with advanced clinicopathological features in clinical specimens, such as tumor size and TNM stage. Notably, patients with low GABARAP levels had a poor prognosis. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) revealed that GABARAP expression negatively correlated with matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 2 and MMP14. Conclusively, these data indicate that GABARAP suppresses the malignant behaviors of breast cancer likely via the AKT/mTOR pathway. The targeting of GABARAP may improve the certainty of diagnosis and treatment strategies for breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据