4.5 Article

Metal-organic framework-derived Ni-based catalyst for the hydrotreatment of triolein into green diesel

期刊

SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & FUELS
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 1809-1820

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1se00104c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Nonprofit Institute Research Grant of CAFINT [CAFYBB2018SZ011]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31770612]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel Ni-based catalysts supported on a porous carbon matrix were prepared and studied for the selective hydrotreatment of triolein, with Ni@C-BTC catalyst showing the highest conversion rate. The influence of calcined temperature on the activity of Ni-based catalysts was investigated, along with detailed physicochemical characterization of the best performing catalyst. The optimal Ni@C-BTC-400 catalyst could be recycled magnetically for four consecutive recycling tests in the hydrotreatment of triolein.
In this work, novel Ni-based catalysts supported on a porous carbon matrix were prepared using a simple hydrothermal method, and studied for the selective hydrotreatment of triolein. Three different catalysts were investigated, including Ni@C-BTC, Ni@C-DHTA and Ni@C-PTA. Of the catalysts studied, the Ni@C-BTC catalyst could achieve the highest conversion (up to 90%) and an excellent cracking ratio (4.61) under moderate reaction conditions (320 degrees C, 3 MPa, 4 h) in cyclohexane. In addition, other Ni-based catalysts prepared under different temperatures were investigated to study the influence of the calcined temperature on the activity of Ni-based catalysts. The influence of the temperature, H-2 pressure, time and catalyst loading amount was investigated for the best performing catalyst (Ni@C-BTC-400). The detailed physicochemical characterization was carried out by means of XRD, SEM, TEM, BET, NH3-TPD, Raman and XPS analysis. In the end, the optimal Ni@C-BTC-400 catalyst could be recycled magnetically, and efficiently applied in the next run for four consecutive recycling tests in the hydrotreatment of triolein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据