4.7 Article

Precision ethylene-styrene copolymers through the ring opening metathesis polymerization of 3-phenyl cyclododecenes

期刊

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 1681-1691

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0py01721c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Petroleum Institute in Abu Dhabi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthesis of sequence-controlled poly(ethylene-co-styrene) copolymers is challenging due to limitations in catalytic olefin polymerizations. An alternative method using ROMP of cyclic olefins followed by hydrogenation can generate ethylene copolymers with regioregularity. Investigating the ROMP of low-strain cyclododecenes provided useful information for mechanistic aspects of polymerization.
Synthesis of sequence-controlled poly(ethylene-co-styrene) copolymers is challenging due to the limitations associated with inherent reactivity ratios for ethylene and styrene in catalytic olefin polymerizations. An alternative method to generate ethylene copolymers is ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) of cyclic olefins followed by hydrogenation, in which a substituted cycloalkene yields polymers analogous to those from copolymerizations of two distinct monomers after post-polymerization hydrogenation. In certain cases, regioregularity (and thus sequence specificity) of these copolymers can be realized if the approach of the metathesis catalyst to the monomer occurs regioselectively. In this work, precision polyolefin copolymers were synthesized by ROMP of phenyl-substituted cyclododecenes and subsequent hydrogenation. The effects of the chain transfer agent, monomer structure, target molar mass and reaction conditions on regioselectivity were investigated using H-1 and C-13 NMR spectroscopies. These investigations of the ROMP of low-strain cyclododecenes provided useful information for the fundamental understanding of mechanistic aspects of the polymerization. Hydrogenation of the polydodecenamers afforded linear low density polyethylenes with a phenyl side chain every twelve backbone carbons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据