4.4 Article

The Association Between Childhood Maltreatment, Mental Health Problems, and Aggression in Justice-Involved Boys

期刊

AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 488-501

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ab.21586

关键词

childhood trauma; psychopathology; aggression; youth; forensic

资金

  1. European Union [FP7-PEOPLE-2010-IOF]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development [ZonMw]
  3. Correctional Institutions Agency of the Ministry of Security and Justice

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The link between childhood maltreatment and adolescent aggression is well documented; yet, studies examining potential mechanisms that explain this association are limited. In the present study, we tested the association between childhood maltreatment and adolescent aggression in boys in juvenile justice facilities (N = 767) and examined the contribution of mental health problems to this relationship. Data on childhood maltreatment, mental health problems, and aggression were collected by means of self-report measures and structural equation models were used to test mediation models. We found that mental health problems mediated the link between maltreatment and aggression. Results demonstrated different pathways depending on the type of aggression examined. The association between childhood maltreatment and reactive aggression was fully mediated by a variety of mental health problems and for proactive aggression the association was partially mediated by mental health problems. We also found that reactive and proactive aggression partially mediated the association between maltreatment and mental health problems. These findings suggest that a transactional model may best explain the negative effects of childhood trauma on mental health problems and (in particular reactive) aggression. In addition, our findings add to the existing evidence that reactive and proactive aggression have different etiological pathways. Aggr. Behav. 41:488-501, 2015. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据