4.1 Article

Promotion of nerve regeneration by biodegradable nanofibrous scaffold following sciatic nerve transection in rats

期刊

PROGRESS IN BIOMATERIALS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 53-64

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40204-021-00151-w

关键词

Nerve injury; Polymer; Regeneration; Scaffold; Sciatic nerve

资金

  1. Vice-Chancellor for Research and Technology of Guilan University of Medical Sciences [97021503]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study designed and developed PLGA-PCL aligned nanofibers, which were implanted into a rat model of nerve injury, showing acceptable improvement after eight weeks.
Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) are one of the common causes of morbidity and disability worldwide. Autograft is considered the gold standard treatment for PNIs. However, due to the complications associated with autografts, other sources are considered as alternatives. Recently, electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds have received wide attention in the field of tissue engineering. Exogenous tubular constructs with uniaxially aligned topographical cues to enhance the axonal re-growth are needed to bridge large nerve gaps between proximal and distal ends. Although several studies have used PLGA/PCL, but few studies have been conducted on developing a two-layer scaffold with aligned fibers properly orientated along the axis direction of the sciatic nerve to meet the physical properties required for suturing, transplantation, and nerve regeneration. In this study, we sought to design and develop PLGA-PCL-aligned nanofibers. Following the conventional examinations, we implanted the scaffolds into 7-mm sciatic nerve gaps in a rat model of nerve injury. Our in vivo evaluations did not show any adverse effects, and after eight weeks, an acceptable improvement was noted in the electrophysiological, functional, and histological analyses. Thus, it can be concluded that nanofiber scaffolds can be used as a reliable approach for repairing PNIs. However, further research is warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据