4.7 Article

Impulsivity facets and mobile phone use while driving: Indirect effects via mobile phone involvement

期刊

ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION
卷 150, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105907

关键词

Mobile phone use while driving; Impulsivity facets; UPPS-P; Mobile phone involvement; Mobile phone addiction; Cell phone addiction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that lower premeditation and higher positive urgency from impulsivity facets significantly predicted various MWD behaviors, while higher mobile phone involvement was a stronger predictor of MWD. There were significant indirect effects of positive and negative urgency on MWD behaviors through mobile phone involvement.
Mobile phone use while driving (MWD) is a threat to road safety, particularly for younger drivers. Research suggests impulsivity may be a psychological risk factor for MWD, however, the literature is limited. The current study examined the unique contributions of impulsivity facets on different social interactive MWD behaviours, and whether these relationships were influenced by mobile phone involvement. Eight hundred and fifty-three young drivers aged 17-25 years (M (age) = 19.89; 74 % female) completed an online questionnaire which included measures of the five-facet model of impulsivity, mobile phone involvement, and MWD (initiating, monitoring/reading, and responding to social communications). Of impulsivity facets, lower premeditation and higher positive urgency significantly predicted each MWD behaviour, while higher sensation seeking significantly predicted responding only, providing some support for differential relationships of impulsivity facets with MWD. Mobile phone involvement was a more robust predictor of MWD. Moreover, there were significant indirect effects of positive and negative urgency via mobile phone involvement for all three MWD behaviours. Findings highlight the importance of mobile phone involvement for explaining MWD which should be addressed in future studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据