4.7 Article

Anthropomorphism brings us closer: The mediating role of psychological distance in User-AI assistant interactions

期刊

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR
卷 118, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106680

关键词

Human-AI interaction; Anthropomorphism; Psychological distance; AI assistant; Smart speaker

资金

  1. Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2019S1A3A2099973]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research demonstrates the positive effects of anthropomorphism on interactions with smart-speaker-based AI assistants through survey and experiment, with psychological distance playing a mediating role in this relationship.
In the current era, interacting with Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become an everyday activity. Understanding the interaction between humans and AI is of potential value because, in future, such interactions are expected to become more pervasive. Two studies-one survey and one experiment-were conducted to demonstrate positive effects of anthropomorphism on interactions with smart-speaker-based AI assistants and to examine the mediating role of psychological distance in this relationship. The results of Study 1, an online survey, showed that participants with a higher tendency to anthropomorphize their AI assistant/s evaluated it/them more positively, and this effect was mediated by psychological distance. In Study 2, the hypotheses were tested in a more sophisticated experiment. Again, the results indicated that, in the high-anthropomorphism (vs. low anthropomorphism) condition, participants had more positive attitudes toward the AI assistant, and the effect was mediated by psychological distance. Though several studies have demonstrated the effect of anthropomorphism, few have probed the underlying mechanism of anthropomorphism thoroughly. The current research not only contributes to the anthropomorphism literature, but also provides direction to research on facilitating human-AI interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据