3.8 Review

The rise of single-cell proteomics

期刊

ANALYTICAL SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 2, 期 3-4, 页码 84-94

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ansa.202000152

关键词

mass spectrometry; single-cell proteomics; ultra-low input proteomics

资金

  1. EPIC-XS [823839]
  2. Horizon 2020 Program of the European Union
  3. ERA-CAPS [I 3686]
  4. Austrian Science Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single-cell proteomics is a rapidly developing field that aims to complement transcriptome and genome data by studying protein expression profiles from individual cells. Recent developments have shown significant improvements in sample preparation and mass spectrometry instrumentation.
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics comprehensively defines proteome expression patterns in thousands of cells majorly contributing to our current understanding of many biological processes. More recently, single-cell transcriptome and genome studies, however, have demonstrated overwhelming heterogeneity of tissues and cellular subpopulations. These studies have indicated different cellular functionality and identity, which are mainly driven by proteins and their posttranscriptional modifications. The rapidly emerging field of single-cell proteomics aims at complementing transcriptome and genome data by generating comparative protein expression profiles from individual cells. Recent developments demonstrated tremendous improvements in sample preparation workflows and MS instrumentation, quantifying over 1000 proteins from a single cell. Efficient and reproducible sample processing in conjunction with sensitive MS acquisition strategies will allow to further increase the proteome coverage of tissues with single-cell resolution. The required throughput and data reliability of such studies are still subject to further developments. Therefore, we herein discuss recent progress on specialized workflows and instrumentation next to advancements outside the field, which we expect to contribute to the development of comprehensive single-cell proteomics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据