4.0 Article

Influence of defect density on the gas sensing properties of multi-layered graphene grown by chemical vapor deposition

期刊

CARBON TRENDS
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cartre.2021.100024

关键词

Graphene; Defects; Sensitivity; Chemical vapor deposition; Kinetics of interaction

资金

  1. European Commission [785219, 881603]
  2. BMBF via the ACDC project [13N15100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is a highly promising technique for large-scale production of graphene with tunability of defects. This study investigates the correlation between defect density and the interaction kinetics of multi-layered graphene (MLG) with nitrogen dioxide (NO2) at different growth temperatures. Results show that higher growth temperatures lead to lower defect density and higher quality MLG, with more defective MLG exhibiting stronger interaction with NO2 molecules during chemi-resistor testing.
Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) has been demonstrated as a highly promising technique for the production of graphene on large scale and enabling tunability of the intrinsic defects of the films during the synthesis. In this work, we report on the correlation between the density of defects (DoD) and the kinetics of interaction of multi-layered graphene (MLG) with nitrogen dioxide (NO2) used as a target gas. We grow MLG on a pre-patterned molybdenum (Mo) catalyst layer, tailoring the DoD while growing MLG at temperatures from 850 degrees C to 980 degrees C. Analysing the Raman spectra, we show the lowering of the DoD as well as a quality dependence of MLG as a function of the growth temperature. The chemi-resistors based on MLG grown at different temperatures unambiguously highlight that, both during the exposure and the subsequent purge phase, the more defective the MLG, the more intense the NO 2 's molecules interaction with MLG. Our results significantly mark a step forward in tuning the sensing properties of MLG without the need of any post-processing of the material after synthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据