3.9 Article

No Evidence for Orbital Clustering in the Extreme Trans-Neptunian Objects

期刊

PLANETARY SCIENCE JOURNAL
卷 2, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/PSJ/abe53e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX17AF21G]
  2. National Science Foundation [AST-2009096, AST-1138766, AST-1536171]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy
  4. U.S. National Science Foundation
  5. Ministry of Science and Education of Spain
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom
  7. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  8. National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  9. Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics at the Ohio State University
  10. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy at Texas AM University
  11. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
  12. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  13. Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovacao
  14. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  15. University of California at Santa Cruz
  16. Argonne National Laboratory
  17. University of Cambridge
  18. Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas-Madrid
  19. University of Chicago
  20. University College London
  21. DES-Brazil Consortium
  22. University of Edinburgh
  23. Eidgenoessische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zuerich
  24. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  25. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  26. Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai (IEEC/CSIC)
  27. Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies
  28. Ludwig-Maximilians Universitaet Muenchen
  29. associated Excellence Cluster Universe
  30. University of Michigan
  31. NFS's NOIRLab
  32. University of Nottingham
  33. Ohio State University
  34. University of Pennsylvania
  35. University of Portsmouth
  36. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
  37. University of Sussex
  38. Texas AM University
  39. OzDES Membership Consortium
  40. MICINN [ESP2017-89838, PGC2018-094773, PGC2018-102021, SEV-2016-0588, SEV-2016-0597, MDM-2015-0509]
  41. ERDF funds from the European Union
  42. CERCA program of the Generalitat de Catalunya
  43. ERC [240672, 291329, 306478]
  44. Brazilian Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia (INCT) do e-Universo (CNPq) [465376/2014-2]
  45. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  46. European Research Council under the European Union
  47. Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago
  48. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  49. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  50. Stanford University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The apparent clustering in longitude of perihelion and ascending nodes of extreme trans-Neptunian objects (ETNOs) has been attributed to the gravitational effects of an unseen planet in the outer solar system. However, analysis of 14 ETNOs does not provide evidence for angular clustering, suggesting that the detected objects are consistent with a uniform population distribution.
The apparent clustering in longitude of perihelion pi and ascending node Omega of extreme trans-Neptunian objects (ETNOs) has been attributed to the gravitational effects of an unseen 5-10 Earth-mass planet in the outer solar system. To investigate how selection bias may contribute to this clustering, we consider 14 ETNOs discovered by the Dark Energy Survey, the Outer Solar System Origins Survey, and the survey of Sheppard and Trujillo. Using each survey's published pointing history, depth, and TNO tracking selections, we calculate the joint probability that these objects are consistent with an underlying parent population with uniform distributions in pi and Omega. We find that the mean scaled longitude of perihelion and orbital poles of the detected ETNOs are consistent with a uniform population at a level between 17% and 94% and thus conclude that this sample provides no evidence for angular clustering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据