4.6 Article

ARID3A promotes the development of colorectal cancer by upregulating AURKA

期刊

CARCINOGENESIS
卷 42, 期 4, 页码 578-586

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgaa118

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [H2018009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that ARID3A expression increased in CRC tissues, potentially acting as a tumor-promoting factor. Overexpression of ARID3A can enhance tumor cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, targeting AURKA to facilitate the malignant phenotype of CRC cells. The ratio of ARID3A and AURKA could serve as a potential biomarker for predicting prognosis in CRC.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignant tumours, and its morbidity and mortality rates are relatively high. However, the aetiology and pathogenesis of CRC have not been clearly elucidated to date. AT-rich interaction domain 3A (ARID3A) is a member of the ARID3 family and a transcription factor that can bind to specific DNA sites to regulate gene expression. It was reported that ARID3A is involved in various biological processes and may be related to carcinogenesis. In this study, by assessing the mRNA level of ARID3A in TCGA database, we found that ARID3A expression increased in CRC tissues, and proposed that ARID3A could act as a tumour-promoting factor in the development of CRC. To verify this hypothesis, we used cell proliferation, migration and invasion assays to assess the effect of ARID3A on CRC cells. We revealed that ARID3A overexpression enhanced tumour cell proliferation, migration and invasion. ARID3A could target Aurora kinase A (AURKA) to facilitate the malignant phenotype of CRC cells, and patients with a higher ratio of AURKA and ARID3A had a better overall survival. Conclusively, this study showed that ARID3A targeted AURKA to facilitate the development of CRC. The ratio of ARID3A and AURKA could be used as a potential biomarker to predict prognosis, providing a new strategy for the diagnosis and prognosis of CRC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据