4.1 Article

Zinc(II) and cadmium(II) coordination polymers with bis(4-pyridyl)benzylamine: structure and photoluminescence

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10847-021-01058-6

关键词

Coordination polymers; Zinc(II) polymers; Cadmium(II) polymers; Crystal structure; Photoluminescence

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [2018R1D1A1B07043305]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1D1A1B07043305] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The two coordination polymers, 1 and 2, exhibit different structural features with a one-dimensional helical structure and a two-dimensional wave-like structure, respectively. They both show strong UV emissions depending on the metal ions and are red-shifted compared to the bpba ligand.
Two coordination polymers, [(bpba)Zn(CH3COO)(2)](n) (1) and [(bpba)(3)Cd-2(NO3)(4)](n)center dot nMeOH center dot 4nH(2)O (2) (bpba = bis(4-pyridyl)benzylamine), were obtained using Zn(CH3COO)(2)center dot 2H(2)O/Cd(NO3)(2)center dot 4H(2)O and bpba in a mixture of solvents, and were further characterized. The zinc(II) ion of 1 showed a tetrahedral geometry with two oxygen atoms of the acetate ligands and two pyridine groups of the bpba ligands, and it is linked to the neighboring zinc(II) ions through the bpba ligands, giving rise to an interesting one-dimensional helical structure. Contrastingly, the cadmium(II) ion of polymer 2 was bonded by three pyridine groups of three different bpba ligands and four oxygen atoms of two nitrate ligands, exhibiting a T-shaped geometry. Thus, polymer 2 forms a two-dimensional wave-like structure by the coordination of cadmium(II) ion and bpba ligand to each other. Polymers 1 and 2 showed strong UV emissions depending on the metal ions and are red-shifted, compared to the bpba ligand.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据