4.6 Article

Pressure-promoted highly-ordered Fe-doped-Ni2B for effective oxygen evolution reaction and overall water splitting

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 9, 期 10, 页码 6469-6475

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ta10010b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11811530001]
  2. Education Department of Hebei Province [ZD2020103]
  3. NSFC (China)-STINT (Sweden)
  4. Swedish Research Council [VR-2016-06014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate doping at special atomic sites can effectively control the active centers for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Doping Fe/Co into Ni2B forms highly ordered FeNiB and CoNiB electrocatalysts, which exhibit low overpotential and high water splitting potential. The substitution of Fe atoms in Ni2B increases the electronic conductivity and catalytic performance, leading to enhanced OER efficiency.
Accurate doping at special atomic sites can achieve effective control of active centers for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER), leading to the synthesis of active intermediates with higher conversion efficiency. Here we report the successful doping of Ni2B with Fe/Co to form highly ordered FeNiB and CoNiB electrocatalysts with a tetragonal Ni2B structure. A highly crystalline FeNiB electrode is found to have a very low polarization overpotential of 257 mV for the OER and a water splitting potential of 1.54 V at a current density of 10 mA cm(-2). XRD refinement, XPS and XAFS characterization found that doping with iron leads to the weakening of the bond strength of TM-B, which facilitates the adsorption of oxygen. During the OER process, the increasing dissolution of boron oxides promotes the effective exposure of metal active centers and boosts the catalytic performance. Theoretical calculations reveal that the substitution of Fe atoms in Ni2B make its DOS near the Fermi level higher by 2.78 times compared to that of the original Ni2B, which helps to increase the electronic conductivity and the catalytic performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据