4.7 Article

The synthesis of a novel titanium oxide aerogel with highly enhanced removal of uranium and evaluation of the adsorption mechanism

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 50, 期 10, 页码 3616-3628

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0dt04320f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Southwest University of Science and Technology [17zx7135]
  2. Sichuan's Training Program of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduate [S202010619057]
  3. Sichuan Science and Technology Innovation Seedling Project Cultivation Project [2019072]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The TiO2 aerogel exhibited high removal percentage and adsorption capacity for U(vi), particularly effective in acidic conditions and unaffected by ionic strength. After five cycles, the removal percentage of the TiO2 aerogel remained above 90%.
A TiO2 aerogel with a high removal percentage and adsorption capacity was manufactured via template synthesis. Subsequently, the as-prepared TiO2 aerogel was characterized by various techniques and applied as an adsorbent for the removal of U(vi). The results revealed that the U(vi) adsorption was very rapid and reached apparent equilibrium within 100 min. The maximum removal percentage was 97.1%, which was calculated using the pseudo-second-order kinetic model (T = 298 K, t = 180 min, pH = 5, m/V = 0.1 g L-1 and C-0 = 10 mg g(-1)). The Langmuir isotherm model was used to determine the maximum adsorption capacity and it achieved 638.0 mg g(-1) (T = 298 K, pH = 5 and m/V = 0.1 g L-1). In addition, the removal of U(vi) on the TiO2 aerogel was relatively good in acidic solution and the removal behavior was independent of the influence of ionic strength. The removal percentage of the as-prepared TiO2 aerogel was higher than 90% after five cycles. Due to these excellent properties such as easy recovery, fast adsorption kinetics, high adsorption capacity and high removal percentage, the TiO2 aerogel might become an extremely employable adsorbent for the extraction of U(vi) in seawater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据