4.6 Article

Triplet state (anti)aromaticity of some monoheterocyclic analogues of benzene, naphthalene and anthracene

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 11, 页码 5060-5074

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nj00207d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [451-03-68/2020-14/200168]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the aromaticity-antiaromaticity switch during the singlet-triplet transition of important monoheterocycles derived from benzene, naphthalene, and anthracene. It was found that spin delocalization leads to antiaromaticity, while spin density localization on a ring or heteroatom reduces global and local antiaromaticity. Silicon-containing compounds exhibit the lowest singlet-triplet energy gaps.
Aromaticity-antiaromaticity switch upon singlet-triplet transition of some biologically and synthetically important monoheterocycles (heteroatom = N, O, Si, P, and S) derived from benzene, naphthalene and anthracene was studied by employing energetic, magnetic and structural aromaticity criteria, at the density functional theory (DFT) level. The relationship between spin density distribution, (anti)aromaticity and singlet-triplet energy gaps, in the studied molecules, was found. In general, spin delocalization results in antiaromaticity, spin density localization to one ring in bi- and tricycles localizes antiaromaticity and spin localization on a heteroatom reduces global and local antiaromaticity. The latter reaches nonaromaticity in the case of silicon atoms which have larger orbitals and show more tendency to accept unpaired electrons. Spin density localization in bi- and tricycles allows benzene subunit(s) to develop local aromaticity, which, when combined with nonaromatic silacycle and weak global antiaromaticity, results in overall triplet state weak aromaticity. The singlet-triplet energy gaps decrease with a decrease in the triplet state antiaromaticity and are the lowest for silicon-containing compounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据