4.7 Review

When human guanylate-binding proteins meet viral infections

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12929-021-00716-8

关键词

GBPs; Antiviral roles; Innate immunity; IFN-I; Virus

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82072263]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Fujian [2018Y9064]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China [2020J02037]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Guanylate-binding proteins (GBPs) play important roles in antiviral innate immunity, but our understanding of their molecular mechanisms in viral infection is limited. Research faces discrepancies and challenges in exploring the functions of GBPs in regulating antiviral innate immunity.
Innate immunity is the first line of host defense against viral infection. After invading into the cells, pathogen-associated-molecular-patterns derived from viruses are recognized by pattern recognition receptors to activate the downstream signaling pathways to induce the production of type I interferons (IFN-I) and inflammatory cytokines, which play critical functions in the host antiviral innate immune responses. Guanylate-binding proteins (GBPs) are IFN-inducible antiviral effectors belonging to the guanosine triphosphatases family. In addition to exerting direct antiviral functions against certain viruses, a few GBPs also exhibit regulatory roles on the host antiviral innate immunity. However, our understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms of GBPs' roles in viral infection and host antiviral innate immune signaling is still very limited. Therefore, here we present an updated overview of the functions of GBPs during viral infection and in antiviral innate immunity, and highlight discrepancies in reported findings and current challenges for future studies, which will advance our understanding of the functions of GBPs and provide a scientific and theoretical basis for the regulation of antiviral innate immunity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据