4.3 Article

Maturation system affects lipid accumulation in bovine oocytes

期刊

REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 33, 期 5, 页码 372-380

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/RD20254

关键词

lipids; in vitro maturation; in vivo maturation; oocytes; intrafollicular transfer of immature oocytes (IFIOT)

资金

  1. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa)
  2. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that oocytes matured through intrafollicular transfer of immature oocytes have similar lipid accumulation to those matured in vivo, indicating better quality than oocytes matured in vitro.
This study evaluated the effects of three maturation systems, namely in vitro (MatV) and in vivo (MatS) systems, as well as intrafollicular transfer of immature oocytes (IFIOT; MatT), on the accumulation of lipid droplets in bovine oocytes. Lipids were evaluated using confocal microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. The expression of genes related to lipid metabolism, namely acyl-CoA synthetase short chain family member 2 (ACSS2), ELOVL fatty acid elongase 1 (ELOVL1) and fatty acid binding protein 3 (FABP3), was quantified by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The mean (+/- s.d.) area occupied by lipids in immature oocytes (13 +/- 2%) was similar to those matured in vivo (MatS, 16 +/- 2%; MatT, 12 +/- 2%). However, there was a significant increase in lipids in oocytes in the MatV group (24 +/- 2%) compared with all other groups (P < 0.001). In the ultrastructural evaluations, MatV oocytes also showed the highest lipid content. The expression of ELOVL1 and FABP3 was similar in the MatS and IFIOT groups. However, transcript levels of ACSS2 were lower in IFIOT than MatV oocytes. These results indicate, for the first time, that oocytes matured by IFIOT are similar to those matured in vivo with regard to lipid accumulation, which indicates better quality than those matured in vitro.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据