4.8 Article

Bifunctional PGM-free metal organic framework-based electrocatalysts for alkaline electrolyzers: trends in the activity with different metal centers

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 4576-4584

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0nr07875a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Israeli Ministry of Science
  2. Israeli Ministry of Aliyah and Integration
  3. Israeli Ministry of Energy
  4. GTEP
  5. Israeli Prime Minister's Office Fuel Choices and Smart Mobility Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows that metal-organic frameworks embedded in activated carbon exhibit catalytic activity for both the oxygen evolution reaction and the hydrogen evolution reaction. Cobalt was identified as the most active metal center, with the potential to serve as a bifunctional catalyst.
In order to solely rely on renewable and efficient energy sources, reliable energy storage and production systems are required. Hydrogen is considered an ideal solution as it can be produced electrochemically by water electrolysis and renewably while no pollutants are released when consumed. The most common catalysts in electrolyzers are composed of rare and expensive precious group metals. Replacing these materials with Earth-abundant materials is important to make these devices economically viable. Metal organic frameworks are one possible solution. Herein we demonstrate the synthesis and characterization studies of metal benzene-tri-carboxylic acid-based metal-organic frameworks embedded in activated carbon. The conductive composite material was found to be electrocatalytically active for both the oxygen evolution reaction and the hydrogen evolution reaction. Furthermore, several metal organic frameworks sharing the same ligand but with different first-row transition metals (M = Co, Cu, Fe, Mn) were compared, and the trend of their activity is discussed. Cobalt was found to have the highest activity among the studied metal centers, and therefore has the best potential to serve as a bifunctional catalyst for alkaline electrolyzers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据