期刊
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 559-569出版社
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01274-4
关键词
Optimal Pricing; Price Discrimination; Pharmacoeconomics; Health Insurance; Health Care Financing; Deadweight Loss
资金
- NIH [R01AG062277]
Pharmaceuticals are conventionally priced uniformly, but their effectiveness varies greatly for different disease indications. With the launch of more high-cost therapies, there is a growing demand for alternative payment models (APMs) in advanced markets. Market inefficiencies create the need for different value-based pricing structures to address obstacles to uniform pricing.
Pharmaceuticals are priced uniformly by convention, but vary in their degree of effectiveness for different disease indications. As more high-cost therapies have launched, the demand for alternative payment models (APMs) has been increasing in many advanced markets, despite their well-documented limitations and challenges to implementation. Among policy justifications for such contracts is the maximization of value given scarce resources. We show that while uniform pricing rules can handle variable effectiveness in efficient markets, market inefficiencies of other kinds create a role for different value-based pricing structures. We first present a stylized theoretical model of efficient interaction among drug manufacturers, payers, and beneficiaries. In this stylized setting, uniform pricing works well, even when treatment effects are variable. We then use this framework to define market failures that result in obstacles to uniform pricing. The market failures we identify include: (1) uncertainty of patient distribution, (2) asymmetric beliefs, (3) agency imperfection by payer, (4) agency imperfection by provider, and (5) patient behavior and treatment adherence. We then apply our insights to real-world examples of alternative payment models, and highlight challenges related to contract implementation.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据