4.6 Article

Nonequilibrium effects on the electron-phonon coupling constant in metals

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 103, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.125412

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF of China [U1837602]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the energy exchange between electrons and phonons in metals is crucial for micro- and nanomanufacturing and system design. A proposed e-ph coupling model successfully includes nonequilibrium effects in the calculation of the e-ph coupling constant, showing a significant reduction due to temporal and spatial nonequilibrium. This work not only enhances the fundamental understanding of the e-ph coupling constant but also improves theoretical descriptions of coupled electron and phonon transport at micro- and nanoscale levels.
Understanding of the energy exchange between electrons and phonons in metals is important for micro- and nanomanufacturing and system design. The electron-phonon (e-ph) coupling constant describes such exchange strength, yet its variation remains still unclear at micro- and nanoscale where the nonequilibrium effects are significant. In this work, an e-ph coupling model is proposed by transforming the full scattering terms into relaxation time approximation forms in the coupled electron and phonon Boltzmann transport equations. Consequently, the nonequilibrium effects are included in the calculation of the e-ph coupling constant. The coupling model is verified by modeling the ultrafast dynamics in femtosecond pump-probe experiments on a metal surface, which shows consistent results with the full integral treatment of scattering terms. The e-ph coupling constant is strongly reduced due to both the temporal nonequilibrium between different phonon branches and the spatial nonequilibrium of electrons in confined space. The present work will promote not only a fundamental understanding of the e-ph coupling constant but also the theoretical description of coupled electron and phonon transport at micro- and nanoscale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据