4.6 Article

Carbon dots derived from Fusobacterium nucleatum for intracellular determination of Fe3+ and bioimaging both in vitro and in vivo

期刊

ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 1121-1131

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ay00020a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31960232]
  2. Scientific Research Fund of Yunnan Education Department [2021J0653]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intracellular Fe3+ plays a critical role in human health, and the development of efficient probes for its detection is crucial for early disease diagnosis. Carbon dots synthesized from Fusobacterium nucleatum demonstrate strong fluorescence, stability, and biocompatibility, with promising applications for intracellular Fe3+ detection in vivo.
Intracellular Fe3+ amount is one of the critical determinants of human health. The development of simple and effective probes for the quantitative detection of Fe(3+)in vivo is of great significance for the early diagnosis of disease or disorder associated with iron deficiency or overload. In this study, remarkable carbon dots, which can serve as a biosensor for efficient intracellular Fe3+ detection, were synthesized by hydrothermal carbonization of Fusobacterium nucleatum, an anaerobic bacterium. The achieved F. nucleatum-carbon dots (Fn-CDs) possessed the features of strong fluorescence, high stability and excellent biocompatibility. The obtained Fn-CDs could easily internalize into both plant cells and human cells with excellent ability for cell tracking and biomedical labeling. The fluorescence of Fn-CDs could still remain for another 24 hours after penetrating into cells. Furthermore, the fluorescent Fn-CDs were very sensitive to the presence of Fe3+ ions even in cells, exhibiting great promising applications in in vivo detection of Fe3+ ions. In addition, the Fn-CDs posed no harm to the mice, being circulated and excreted within a short time, making the Fn-CDs an excellent candidate for bioimaging and biosensing in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据