4.5 Article

Unbound spectra of neutron-rich oxygen isotopes predicted by the Gamow shell model

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 103, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.034305

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0404401]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11835001, 11921006, 12035001, 11975282]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University [NPT2020ZZ01, NPT2020KFY13]
  4. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB34000000]
  5. CUSTIPEN (China-U.S. Theory Institute for Physics with Exotic Nuclei) - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science [de-sc0009971]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Gamow shell model efficiently describes weakly bound and unbound nuclear systems, as demonstrated in this study on neutron-dripline oxygen isotopes. Continuum coupling is found to be important for describing the isotopes, especially O-28, and predicting weakly bound and resonance excited states. The radial properties of the studied many-body states are clearly depicted through one-body density analysis.
The Gamow shell model has shown to efficiently describe weakly bound and unbound nuclear systems, as internucleon correlations and continuum coupling are both taken into account in this model. In the present work, we study neutron-dripline oxygen isotopes. It is hereby demonstrated that the presence of continuum coupling is important for the description of oxygen isotopes at dripline, and especially to assess the eventual bound or unbound character of O-28. Our results suggest that the ground state of O-28 is weakly unbound and is similar to O24-26 the narrow resonant O-26 ground state. Predictions of weakly bound and resonance excited states in are also provided. The asymptotes of the studied many-body states are analyzed via one-body densities, whereby the different radial properties of well bound, loosely bound, resonance states are clearly depicted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据