4.8 Article

How can trustworthy influencers be identified in electronic word-of-mouth communities?

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120596

关键词

Influencers; Reviewer?s trustworthiness; Electronic Word-of-Mouth communities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research focuses on analyzing the behavior of influencers in online communities to identify trustworthy reviewers by considering different attributes obtained from system-generated profiles. Findings reveal strong relationships between a reviewer's involvement, sociability, and specific actions with their level of trustworthiness.
Given eWOM?s growing importance and the interest of companies in having their products positively rated, it is necessary to analyze the behavior of influencers in online communities and determine the activities that might explain their level of trustworthiness. This paper focuses on identifying the different attributes obtained from online communities? system-generated profiles to consider trustworthy reviewers. A structural equation model has been developed to measure trustworthiness as a construct, using the peer-nominated approach and a variety of indicators. Findings reveal a range of behavior patterns that can identify influencers based on their trustworthiness. A reviewer?s involvement and sociability have strong relationships with the trust that he/she evokes in other users. Actions such posting reviews, scoring other members? reviews and adding them to his/her trust network have a great relationship with trustworthiness. Also, a reviewer?s specialization and experience have significant, although weaker, relationships with his/her level of trustworthiness. This research makes significant managerial contributions in detecting the most trustworthy and influential reviewers, and their characteristic actions to focus their use of viral marketing techniques on this subset of users with the aim of sparking interest in certain products in a faster, more credible and more efficient way in terms of costs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据