4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Improved averaging of hysteresis loops from micromagnetic simulations of non-interacting uniaxial nanoparticles

期刊

AIP ADVANCES
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/9.0000158

关键词

-

资金

  1. MICINN [MAT2015-65295-R]
  2. UCLM
  3. Banco Santander

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces an optimized method for hysteresis loop averaging to reduce computational time for generating ensembles of magnetic nanoparticles, and demonstrates its effectiveness by comparing results with the Stoner-Wohlfarth hysteresis loop.
Micromagnetic simulations allow us to understand the magnetization reversal of magnetic systems, but the computational cost scales up with the size and, in the case of bulk-scale systems, it becomes an impossible task to face unless certain assumptions are made (e.g. uniform and fully saturated magnetization or simplified anisotropy). However, those simplifications do not work for more complex systems with domain walls, shape anisotropy or exchange-bias. Macroscopic ensembles of non-interacting Magnetic Nanoparticles (MNP) can be modelled as an average of a set of isolated single-domain nanoparticles where magnetocrystalline anisotropies force the particle moments in a wide range of directions. To reduce computational time in such systems, we propose an optimized method of hysteresis loop averaging that takes advantage of high rotational symmetry of spherical particles and proves convenient for energy landscapes such as that in magnetocrystalline uniaxial systems. This improved method reduces the number of simulations required to generate macroscopic-like non-interacting and randomly oriented ensembles of magnetic nanoparticles (i.e. a dilute powder), as compared to the usual mean arithmetic averaging of hysteresis loops. To verify the good agreement of the averaging method we have compared our results with the well-known Stoner-Wohlfarth hysteresis loop, thus matching magnetic properties such as coercivity, remanence and energetic product with a relatively low count of simulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据