4.3 Article

Groundwater governance: The illegality of exploitation and ways to minimize the problem

期刊

出版社

ACAD BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765202120200623

关键词

illegal well; participation; stakeholder engagement; sustainability; water governance; water resources

资金

  1. (CAPES) Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior Department of Waters and Electrical Power (DAEE)
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2013/22469-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study highlights the prevalence of illegal wells in Brazil, with 88% of them being unauthorized; lack of understanding and engagement from users contributes to unsustainable groundwater exploitation; solutions include social communication programs, user participation, and enhanced government control and inspection mechanisms.
In Brazil, there are about 2.5 million tubular wells in which 88% of them are illegal, extracting more than 17,580 Mm(3)/yr. This irregular use may cause sustainability issues that may be economic, social, or environmental (overexploitation, well losses and associated increases of water conflicts; aquifer contamination; and land subsidence). This paper aims to address the illegal wells in Brazil and discuss measures to minimize it. Conclusions indicate that users do not understand the aquifer dynamic and, therefore, do not have a proper understanding of problems such as loss of water quality and quantity caused by the excess of groundwater exploitation. This creates a false idea that there are no water conflicts among users, which causes a lack of engagement by society. Without groundwater users and stakeholder pressure, the government does not aim to control or close illegal wells, and the vicious cycle persists. The one way to break this vicious cycle would be programs of social communication and users' participation, coupled with improvements to the control apparatus and inspection from State institutions, making sure that there is correct management and not only legislations that are not applied.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据