4.2 Article

How social start-ups avoid being falling stars when developing social innovation

期刊

CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 320-335

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/caim.12431

关键词

case study; process; social innovation; start‐ up; success

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to provide new insights into the development process of social innovation (SI) in the context of social start-ups. It identifies key challenges faced by social start-ups, such as lack of expertise in social problems and resources allocation. Overcoming these challenges requires balancing vision and motivations, engaging stakeholders, and adopting suitable tools.
The aim of this study is to provide new insights into the social innovation (SI) development process in the context of social start-ups. A multiple case study identifies the issues and mechanisms for social start-ups to develop a social need into a potentially scalable innovation and to validate and scale it up, while avoiding a possible failure. Results show that key challenges faced by social start-ups can be characterized according to the stage of the SI development path. Firstly, social start-ups' failure can be caused by the lack of expertise in social problems and of flexible processes for social ventures creation; secondly, by the lack of awareness of SI benefits and proper resources allocation; and, finally, by a weak understanding of the impact and intangible outcomes of the developed SI in society, while ensuring its economic sustainability. Successfully overcoming these challenges requires social start-ups to put in place the following mechanisms: (1) leveraging a vision and motivations that balance tensions in terms of the radical, economic and cultural aspects of SI; (2) engaging the SI stakeholders in different (and sequential) phases of SI development process; and (3) identifying and adopting the most suitable technological, financial and communication tools in an integrated way.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据