4.6 Article

Citizens and Positive Energy Districts: Are Espoo and Leipzig Ready for PEDs?

期刊

BUILDINGS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/buildings11030102

关键词

positive energy districts; citizen; cities; participation; citizen engagement

资金

  1. Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS (SPARCS) [864242]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the study, citizen engagement in Espoo and Leipzig was analyzed to assess their readiness for developing and implementing positive energy districts (PEDs). Espoo has a well-established system for promoting citizen engagement, while Leipzig has rich experience from national and European projects. Both cities are aiming to boost the development of PEDs with citizens, not only within Europe but globally as well.
In urban transformation, no solution works without citizen support. With increasing numbers of building technologies and large-scale urban development on its way across cities, it has become vital to keep citizens informed, engaged, and content with the new changes. This paper looks at citizen engagement in Espoo (Finland) and Leipzig (Germany), and it determines whether the cities are ready for developing and implementing positive energy districts (PEDs). The authors studied the cities' operations and current citizen engagement methods to understand how the efforts could be combined and improved. The analysis indicated that the city of Espoo already has a well-established system that continuously promotes citizen engagement at various levels, and combining the available infrastructure with company experts on citizen participation will allow Espoo to seamlessly transition towards PEDs in the near future. The city of Leipzig has a rich experience due to several national projects and participation in an earlier European project, which enabled the city to set clearer goals for the future and modify existing citizen methods. As lighthouse cities, findings from Espoo and Leipzig are also aimed at cities across Europe and beyond to boost development of PEDs together with citizens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据