4.7 Article

Living Mulch with Selected Herbs for Soil Management in Organic Apple Orchards

期刊

HORTICULTURAE
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae7030059

关键词

agroecology; biodiversity; root morphology; soil mulching; weed management

资金

  1. Coordination of European Transnational Research in Organic Food and Farming Systems (CORE Organic) [1939]
  2. NCBR [COREORG/COFUND/DOMINO/1/2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Establishing living mulches with specific plant species like Alchemilla vulgaris and Mentha piperita in organic apple orchards can help control weeds, increase plant biodiversity, improve tree nutritional status, and enhance root density.
The establishment of living mulches in organic orchards could potentially improve the orchard biodiversity and, when specific plant species are selected, provide additional eco-services and functions, including adequate weed management. This study was conducted in an organically managed apple orchard in Skierniewice (Poland) to assess the effect of two selected living mulching species: Alchemilla vulgaris and Mentha piperita. They were assessed on weed control, weed biodiversity, tree nutritional status, root dry weight density (RDWD), and other root morphological traits compared to a natural soil cover (control). Overall, both living mulches produced 42.5% more dry biomass, increased weed species number (+29%), and increased soil coverage (+33%) compared to control mowed plots. The apple leaf chlorophyll index and nutrient content were higher in the presence of both living mulches than in the control. In addition, apple trees had 30-46% higher root dry weight densities, even though other root morphological traits were not affected by the treatments. The results suggested that the tree row can be managed with living mulches of herbs; these species have the potential to provide an additional income to the farmer, as well as beneficial effects for the orchard biodiversity, without impairing the tree root development and nutrient status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据