4.6 Article

Dual-Motor Planetary Transmission to Improve Efficiency in Electric Vehicles

期刊

MACHINES
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/machines9030058

关键词

electric vehicles; efficient power transmission; dual-motor powertrain; planetary gear combiner; sustainable transportation systems

资金

  1. Horizon 2020 European Commission [821988 ADE]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a dual-motor solution for electric cars, where two smaller motors are coupled via a planetary gear, resulting in a higher overall energy efficiency of about 9% compared to a single-motor power transmission system. The dual-motor architecture ensures that both motors operate in the vicinity of their optimal working range.
Electric cars are typically subject to highly variable operational conditions, especially when they drive in urban environments. Consequently, the efficiency of the electric motors may degrade significantly, possibly leading to lower autonomy and higher running costs. Latest advances in power electronics and motion control have paved the way to the development of novel architectures of full electric power transmissions. In this paper, a dual-motor solution is proposed where two smaller motors are coupled via a planetary gear, in contrast to the standard configuration that uses one larger motor directly connected to the drive wheels with a fixed ratio reducer. The dual-motor architecture guarantees that both motors operate in the vicinity of their optimal working range, resulting in a higher overall energy efficiency. The technical requirements and the control strategy of the dual-motor system are selected through a parametric optimization process. Results included were obtained from extensive simulations performed over different standard driving cycles, showing that the dual-motor power transmission generally outperforms the single-motor counterpart with an average efficiency improvement of about 9% that is reached in both the power delivery and regeneration stage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据