4.5 Article

The impact of public employment: Evidence from Bonn

期刊

JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS
卷 122, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2020.103291

关键词

Economic geography; Public employment; Place-Based policies; German division

资金

  1. European Research Council [263733]
  2. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L011719/1]
  3. ESRC [ES/S007121/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [263733] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper evaluates the impact of changes in public employment on private sector activity using the creation of the new West German government in Bonn in the wake of the Second World War as a source of exogenous variation. The study finds that while there is a substantial increase in public employment in Bonn, it results in only modest increases in private sector employment. Each additional public sector job destroys around 0.2 jobs in industry and creates just over one additional job in other parts of the private sector.
This paper evaluates the impact of changes in public employment on private sector activity using the creation of the new West German government in Bonn in the wake of the Second World War as a source of exogenous variation. To guide our empirical analysis, we develop a simple economic geography model in which public sector employment affects private sector employment through its impact on wages and house prices and also through potential productivity and amenity spillovers to the private sector. We find that relative to a control group of cities, Bonn experiences a substantial increase in public employment. However, this results in only modest increases in private sector employment with each additional public sector job destroying around 0.2 jobs in industry and creating just over one additional job in other parts of the private sector. We show how our model can explain this finding and provide several pieces of evidence for the mechanisms emphasized by the model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据