4.0 Article

How many key informants are enough? Analysing the validity of the community readiness assessment

期刊

BMC RESEARCH NOTES
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-021-05497-9

关键词

Community-based health promotion; Assessment; Community readiness; Validity; Key informants

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01EL1822A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A total of 55 community readiness interviews were conducted in four communities. Overall, little variation in community readiness scores was observed after interviewing 10 key informants in a community. However, even after completing 10 interviews in a community, key informants were still able to identify up to 6 new information items related to community efforts for physical activity promotion among the elderly, contact and communication channels for reaching the target group, or barriers to participation.
ObjectiveCommunities are important settings for health promotion and prevention. The community readiness assessment offers a structured approach to assess resources and opportunities to tackle a health problem within a community. The assessment relies on semi-structured interviews with key informants from the communities. A number of 4-6 key informant interviews are recommended in the literature. However, it is unclear whether this is sufficient to obtain a valid representation of the respective community. This study analysed whether increasing the number of key informants from 4-6 to 12-15 alters the results of the community readiness assessment.ResultsA total of 55 community readiness interviews were carried out in 4 communities. Overall, the community readiness scores showed little variation after having interviewed 10 key informants in a community. However, even after completing 10 interviews in a community, key informants were still able to identify up to 6 new information items regarding community efforts for physical activity promotion among the elderly, contact and communication channel for informing or approaching the target group, or barriers to participation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据