4.2 Article

A meta-analysis of the epidemiology of giant cell arteritis across time and space

期刊

ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13075-021-02450-w

关键词

GCA; Giant cell arteritis; Temporal arteritis; Meta-analysis; Epidemiology; Geographic variation; Temporal trend; Mortality; Prevalence; Incidence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The incidence of GCA varies nearly 3-fold between regions and is highest in Scandinavia but not significantly. Mortality may be improving over time.
IntroductionGiant cell arteritis (GCA) is a common large vessel vasculitis in those over age 50years. This meta-analysis examined the geographical and temporal distribution of the incidence, prevalence, and mortality of GCA.MethodsA systematic review was conducted using EMBASE, Scopus, and PubMed from their inceptions until 2019. Studies were included if they reported at least 50 or more GCA patients and defined the location and time frame. Articles on mortality were included and standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was extracted where possible. Mean pooled prevalence, incidence, and SMR were calculated using a random effects model. Linear regression was used to explore correlations between latitude and incidence, prevalence, and mortality.ResultsOf the 3569 citations identified, 107 were included. The pooled incidence of GCA was 10.00 [9.22, 10.78] cases per 100,000 people over 50years old. This incidence was highest in Scandinavia 21.57 [18.90, 24.23], followed by North and South America 10.89 [8.78, 13.00], Europe 7.26 [6.05, 8.47], and Oceania 7.85 [-1.48, 17.19]. Pooled prevalence was 51.74 [42.04, 61.43] cases per 100,000 people over age 50. Annual mortality was 20.44 [17.84, 23.03] deaths/1000. Mortality generally decreased over the years of publication (p =0.0008). Latitude correlated significantly with incidence (p =0.0011), but not with prevalence, or mortality.ConclusionsGCA incidence varies nearly 3-fold between regions and is highest in Scandinavia but not significantly. Mortality may be improving over time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据