4.6 Article

In situ formation of polymer electrolytes using a dicationic imidazolium cross-linker for high-performance lithium ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 9, 期 9, 页码 5796-5806

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ta09249e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 107-3113-E-006-006, 108-3116-F-006-012-CC1, 108-2622-8-006-014, 109-2622-8-006-005]
  2. Hierarchical Green-Energy Materials (Hi-GEM) Research Center, from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within Ministry of Education (MOE)
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan [MOST 107-3017-F-006-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study utilized a solventless polymerization strategy to fabricate high-performance polymer electrolytes directly on the lithium anode, resulting in superior thermal stability, conductivity, and charge-discharge capacity. This approach represents a promising method for next-generation lithium ion battery technologies.
Improving the electrochemical performance of polymer electrolytes in lithium ion batteries has been intensively studied. Herein, we adopted an in situ solventless polymerization strategy to fabricate PEG-based electrolytes cross-linked by a dicationic imidazolium compound directly onto the lithium anode, providing a direct, effective, and versatile pathway for the preparation of electrolytes. The electrolytes exhibit high thermal stability, a wide electrochemical window, an ionic conductivity higher than 10(-4) S cm(-1) and an outstanding deformation stability without cracking at a 60% compressive strain. A conformal attachment at the electrolyte/electrode interface and a superior charge-discharge capacity as well as a long cycle life at 25 degrees C (0.2C rate, 93.8% after 150 cycles) and 60 degrees C (0.5C rate, 94.6% after 100 cycles) can be achieved in the equipped Li/LiFePO4 cell by forming electrolytes on lithium metal directly, which represents a promising approach for next-generation lithium ion battery technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据