4.8 Review

Radiolabelling of nanomaterials for medical imaging and therapy

期刊

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
卷 50, 期 5, 页码 3355-3423

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cs00384k

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/S032789/1, EP/R045046/1]
  2. Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Medical Engineering [WT/203148/Z/16/Z]
  3. KCL Comprehensive Cancer Imaging Centre - CRUK
  4. EPSRC
  5. MRC
  6. DoH (England)
  7. Wellcome Trust Multiuser Equipment Grant: A multiuser radioanalytical facility for molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy research [212885/Z/18/Z]
  8. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and KCL [IS-BRC-1215-20006]
  9. UCL Comprehensive Cancer Imaging Centre - CRUK
  10. EPSRC [EP/S032789/1, EP/R045046/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanomaterials have unique properties for medical imaging and therapy, and efforts have been made to translate nanomedicines into clinical practice. Studying biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of nanomedicinal-drugs from early stages is crucial for effective clinical translation. Radiolabelling nanomaterials enables in vivo tracking for imaging and therapy, but selection of appropriate radiolabelling method is critical for robust information during development.
Nanomaterials offer unique physical, chemical and biological properties of interest for medical imaging and therapy. Over the last two decades, there has been an increasing effort to translate nanomaterial-based medicinal products (so-called nanomedicines) into clinical practice and, although multiple nanoparticle-based formulations are clinically available, there is still a disparity between the number of pre-clinical products and those that reach clinical approval. To facilitate the efficient clinical translation of nanomedicinal-drugs, it is important to study their whole-body biodistribution and pharmacokinetics from the early stages of their development. Integrating this knowledge with that of their therapeutic profile and/or toxicity should provide a powerful combination to efficiently inform nanomedicine trials and allow early selection of the most promising candidates. In this context, radiolabelling nanomaterials allows whole-body and non-invasive in vivo tracking by the sensitive clinical imaging techniques positron emission tomography (PET), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Furthermore, certain radionuclides with specific nuclear emissions can elicit therapeutic effects by themselves, leading to radionuclide-based therapy. To ensure robust information during the development of nanomaterials for PET/SPECT imaging and/or radionuclide therapy, selection of the most appropriate radiolabelling method and knowledge of its limitations are critical. Different radiolabelling strategies are available depending on the type of material, the radionuclide and/or the final application. In this review we describe the different radiolabelling strategies currently available, with a critical vision over their advantages and disadvantages. The final aim is to review the most relevant and up-to-date knowledge available in this field, and support the efficient clinical translation of future nanomedicinal products for in vivo imaging and/or therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据