4.2 Article

Impacts of pulsed electric field and heat treatment on quality and sensory properties and microbial inactivation of pomegranate juice

期刊

FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 23, 期 8, 页码 668-680

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1082013217715369

关键词

Pulsed electric field; pomegranate juice; E; coli O157:H7; S; aureus; inactivation kinetics; multiple (non-) linear regression

资金

  1. Abant Izzet Baysal University [2008.09.01.286]
  2. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [104O585]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synergistic effects of pulsed electric field+mild heat on quality properties of pomegranate juice were modeled using the best-fit multiple (non-) linear regression models with inactivation kinetics parameters of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Staphylococcus aureus. No significant difference was detected between the control and the treated samples in terms of pH; degrees Brix; total antioxidant capacity; total monomeric anthocyanin content; total ascorbic acid concentration; and the sensory properties of flavor, taste, aftertaste, and overall acceptance (p>0.05). An exposure of 65.3 J and 40? caused an increase on conductivity; titratable acidity; L*, a*, and b* values; and a decrease of browning index, total phenolic content, total antioxidant capacity, total monomeric anthocyanin content, total ascorbic acid concentration, and in the sensory properties of color and sourness in pomegranate juice. The goodness-of-fit for the best-fit multiple (non-) linear regression models in descending order belonged to E. coli O157:H7 (92.98%), S. aureus (84.06%), color a* (83.9%), titratable acidity (81.3%), color L* (78.5%), color b* (78.3%), conductivity (74.8%), total phenolic content (74.1%), and total ascorbic acid concentration (64.74%), respectively. D-e and z(e) values for E. coli O157:H7 and S. aureus ranged from 105.64 to 1093.25 and from 79.18 to 1057.73 mu s with 27.39 and 30.80 J, consequently.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据