4.8 Article

Nacre-like Mechanically Robust Heterojunction for Lithium-Ion Extraction

期刊

MATTER
卷 4, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.matt.2020.12.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0206904, 2017YFA0206900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21625303, 51673206, 21434003, 21905287]
  3. Strategic Prior Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA21010213]
  4. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [2194088]
  5. Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDY-SSW-SLH014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ion-gating heterojunction inspired by natural nacre structure demonstrates mechanical robustness and efficient ion extraction selectivity for lithium, sodium, and potassium ions. This nanolaminate membrane has potential applications in lithium-ion batteries and ion-separation membrane designs.
Nanolaminate membranes composed of two-dimensional materials are promising candidates for molecular sieving via size-limited diffusion and charge effect in nanoconfinement, but these materials suffer from weak mechanical properties and instability in water due to the hydrophilicity. Here, inspired by natural nacre structure, we design an ion-gating heterojunction with opposite charges and asymmetrical nanochannels. Nanofibers and nanosheets form a typical brick-and-mortar structure, which exhibits mechanical robustness compared with other reported materials. Additionally, the heterostructure contributes to both restraining concentration polarization and generating spontaneous potential gradient. Thus, based on the confined dehydration and charge-exclusion effects, we reveal the ordered transport rank Li+ > Na+ > K+ > Mg (2+) > Ca2+, which depends on the valence and radius of ions. Ionic gating achieves the extraction of lithium ions with the Li+/Na+ and Li+/K+ selectivity of 2.52 and 4.78. This membrane may have applications in lithium-ion batteries and designs of ion-separation membranes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据