4.4 Article

Correlation of accommodation and lens location with higher-order aberrations and axial length elongation during orthokeratology lens wear

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15599612.2020.1857889

关键词

Axial length; accommodation; higher-order aberration; myopia; orthokeratology; Orbscan II

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Overnight orthokeratology has effects on higher-order wavefront aberrations, axial length elongation, and accommodation. The study found a strong correlation between spherical aberration and changes in corneal thickness and curvature, as well as a correlation between axial length elongation and coma and spherical aberration.
This study examined the effects of overnight orthokeratology (OK) on higher-order wavefront aberrations (HOA), axial length elongation, and accommodation. Low to moderate myopic subjects with healthy eyes wore OK lenses nightly for 9 months. Corneal topography wavefront aberrations and accommodation were measured approximately monthly. Linear mixed-effects models were used to examine the association between the change in peripheral corneal parameters relative to the central cornea with HOA, and the association of accommodation and axial length elongation with HOA. Thirty-three participants (mean age 19.61 years) were included. Mean baseline refraction was -2.97 D (range, -1.0 to -5.0 D). The level of spherical aberration (SA) was associated with a change in relative superior-central corneal thickness (beta = -0.21, SE = 0.10, p < 0.037) and with the increased difference in superior-central corneal curvature (beta = 0.34, SE = 0.15, p = 0.026). The change of coma increased with the change in relative superior corneal curvature (beta = 0.84, SE = 0.18, p < 0.001). Axial length elongation was associated with both horizontal coma (beta = 0.19, SE = 0.07, p = 0.018) and SA (beta = 0.20, SE = 0.07, p = 0.003). While accommodation and axial length were correlated with HOA, axial length elongation was not correlated with accommodation in OK lens wearers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据