4.5 Article

A Knowledge-Enriched and Span-Based Network for Joint Entity and Relation Extraction

期刊

CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA
卷 68, 期 1, 页码 377-389

出版社

TECH SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.32604/cmc.2021.016301

关键词

Entity recognition; relation extraction; dependency parsing

资金

  1. Jiangsu Province 333 project [BRA2020418]
  2. NSFC [71901215]
  3. National University of Defense Technology Research Project [ZK20-46]
  4. Outstanding Young Talents Program of National University of Defense Technology
  5. National University of Defense Technology Youth Innovation Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The joint extraction of entities and their relations from texts is crucial for natural language processing. A hybrid neural framework incorporating external knowledge improved performance in handling overlapping issues and relation prediction. Experiments on a Chinese military corpus validated the effectiveness of the proposed method in entity and relation extraction.
The joint extraction of entities and their relations from certain texts plays a significant role in most natural language processes. For entity and relation extraction in a specific domain, we propose a hybrid neural framework consisting of two parts: a span-based model and a graph-based model. The span-based model can tackle overlapping problems compared with BILOU methods, whereas the graph-based model treats relation prediction as graph classification. Our main contribution is to incorporate external lexical and syntactic knowledge of a specific domain, such as domain dictionaries and dependency structures from texts, into end-to-end neural models. We conducted extensive experiments on a Chinese military entity and relation extraction corpus. The results show that the proposed framework outperforms the baselines with better performance in terms of entity and relation prediction. The proposed method provides insight into problems with the joint extraction of entities and their relations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据