3.9 Article

Impact of activation energy and gyrotactic microorganisms on flow of Casson hybrid nanofluid over a rotating moving disk

期刊

HEAT TRANSFER
卷 50, 期 6, 页码 5380-5399

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/htj.22129

关键词

activation energy; bioconvection; Casson fluid; magnetic effect; upward/downward-moving rotating disk

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study utilized a modified Buongiorno model to investigate the Casson hybrid nanofluid flow on a rotating disk filled with gyrotactic microorganisms. The results indicated significant impacts of activation energy, bioconvection, and magnetic effect on the flow field, with an increase in the Brownian motion parameter leading to higher heat transfer rates.
Many models of various non-Newtonian fluid flows for different geometries are available for analyzing the mass and heat transfer. Nevertheless, for researchers, it is challenging to choose the most suitable model for a specific geometry. Here, we have adopted a modified Buongiorno model to explore the impact of activation energy on the Casson hybrid nanofluid flow over an upward/downward-moving rotating disk filled with the gyrotactic microorganisms. Moreover, the external magnetic field can establish the magnetic effect, which normalizes the features of heat, mass transfer, and fluid flow. Here, we used silver and copper as nanoparticles suspended in human blood as the carrier fluid. The modeled partial differential equations are converted to ordinary differential equations by opting suitable similarity variables. The numerical solutions of these reduced equations are attained by means of Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg fourth-fifth-order method by adopting a shooting scheme. An investigation of the attained outcomes reveals that the flow field is affected appreciably by the activation energy, bioconvection, and magnetic effect. Peclet and concentration difference numbers diminish the microorganism's profile. A rise in values of the Brownian motion parameter leads to an increase in the rate of heat transfer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据