4.6 Review

A Systematic Review of Drivers and Constraints on Agricultural Expansion in Sub-Saharan Africa

期刊

LAND
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/land10030332

关键词

agricultural expansion; drivers; Sub-Saharan Africa; conservation; constraints

资金

  1. UK Research and Innovation through the Global Challenges Research Fund programme, Growing research capability to meet the challenges faced by developing countries (Grow) [ES/P011306/1]
  2. University of Reading

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a systematic review of the drivers of agricultural expansion from 1970 to 2020, revealing that population dynamics and government policies are key underlying drivers, while proximate drivers include economic opportunities and more troubling trends.
Understanding the dynamics of agricultural expansion, their drivers, and interactions is critical for biodiversity conservation, ecosystem-services provision, and the future sustainability of agricultural development in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, there is limited understanding of the drivers of agricultural expansion. A systematic review of the drivers of agricultural expansion was conducted from 1970 to 2020 using Web of Science, Elsevier Scopus and Google Scholar. Two researchers reviewed the papers separately based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fifteen papers were included in the final systematic review. The paper proposed expansion pathways in a conceptual framework and identified proximate and underlying drivers. Population dynamics and government policies were found to be key underlying drivers of agricultural expansion. The proximate drivers include economic opportunities such as agriculture mechanisation and cash crops production, and more troubling trends such as soil fertility decline and climate change and variability. This paper further explores the constraints that have been found to slow down agricultural expansion, including strong land institutions and good governance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据