4.7 Article

Yacon syrup: Food applications and impact on satiety in healthy volunteers

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 460-467

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.035

关键词

Smallanthus sonchifolius; Focal group; Yogurt; Satiety

资金

  1. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA SEG) [03.14.13.008.00.00]
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [447191/2014-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Syrup obtained from yacon roots could be well positioned as a nutritional product due to its high fructooligo-saccharides (FOS) content. Considering this, we examined the potential food applications of yacon syrup, using the focal group methodology, and its sensorial acceptability when incorporated in yogurt. The beneficial effects of the consumption of yacon syrup were studied over a 2-week period in a double-blind placebo-controlled experiment (namely Test A) and other consistent of only one day of yacon syrup consumption (namely Test B) were also evaluated. The doses of yacon syrup for both experiments were 8.74 g of FOS/day. Energy intake, hunger, satiety, fullness and prospective food consumption were assessed with analogue scales at the end of each test. The results indicate that the yogurt was the food most suggested by the focus group, and. the average of the scores given to the attributes when the yacon syrup was incorporated into a yogurt were: 7.78 for appearance; 7.72 for aroma; 7.02 for flavor and 6.96 for overall acceptability, corresponding to like very much and like moderately. Furthermore, the results indicate that yacon syrup has a positive effect on appetite and its effect was dependent on gender and period of intervention, being statistically significant (P < 0.05) in women, after 2-week period. These findings suggested that increasing FOS intake could help to increase satiety, and consequently, be helpful in the management of type 2-diabetes or control of the current high prevalence of overweight or obesity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据