4.0 Article

Taxonomic Relations of Russian and Persian Sturgeons (genus Acipenser, Acipenseridae): an Updated Synthesis

期刊

JOURNAL OF ICHTHYOLOGY
卷 61, 期 1, 页码 17-32

出版社

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S0032945221010173

关键词

Acipenser persicus; A; gueldenstaedtii; A; persicus colchicus; taxonomy; morphology; genetics; distribution

资金

  1. [ZMMU AAAA-A16-116021660077-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study conducted a comparative analysis of the morphological, genetic, and ecological features of Russian, Persian, and Colchic sturgeons to assess their taxonomic relations, confirming the presence of two closely related and morphologically similar species in the Caspian basin. The Colchic sturgeon remains virtually unstudied genetically and is considered to be an independent subspecies of the Persian sturgeon. Further research is needed to explore the distribution of the Colchic sturgeon in the Black Sea basin.
A comparative analysis of data on the morphological, genetic and ecological features of Russian, Persian and Colchic sturgeons was carried out in order to assess their taxonomic relations, diagnostic characteristics and distribution patterns in the Ponto-Caspian basin. The results confirmed the presence of two close related and morphologically similar species in the Caspian basin-Acipenser gueldenstaedtii and A. persicus, the reproductive isolation of which was proved by genetic data. The complex of diagnostic characters of these species includes, in addition to the traditionally accepted body color and the shape of the snout, several craniological indices: Pds/Ri and W/Ri. The Colchic sturgeon remains virtually unstudied from a genetic point of view. The results obtained allow us to consider it an independent subspecies - A. persicus colchicus. It differs from the Caspian Persian sturgeon, as well as from the Russian sturgeon with a longer snout and larger values of the craniological index B/Ri. The distribution of the Colchic sturgeon in the Black Sea basin requires further research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据