期刊
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 8-16出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.11.005
关键词
Fast sensory method; Co-inertia analysis; Free-choice profiling; Descriptive analysis
资金
- Regional Council of the Pays de la Loire
Mixed Profiling (MP) is a descriptive profiling combining a pre-established list of descriptors scored by all tasters and the possibility for each panellist to add free descriptors. All the descriptors, free or not, are rated on an intensity scale. The aim is to improve the reliability of wine characterisation in a professional context. Quantitative Descriptive Analysis (R) provides a fine characterisation while free-choice profiling is a more holistic method that is easier to implement with professionals. In general, professionals are not trained together and evaluate wines using pre-defined descriptors. MP aims to combine the power of the two methods. It is compared to a classical profiling (CP) largely performed in a wine professional context that uses a pre-defined list of descriptors. Ten red wines were evaluated by two distinct panels of wine professionals without prior common training. Performances of the panel were verified using variance analysis and the results of both sensory methodologies were compared using a multi-block method. The results reveal that MP avoids the omission of a specific sensory characteristic and provides a complete sensory characterisation of products in a short time. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据