4.7 Article

A controlled synthesis of γ-MnOOH nanorods via a facile hydrothermal method for high-performance Li-ion batteries

期刊

CRYSTENGCOMM
卷 23, 期 12, 页码 2376-2383

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ce00170a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20771053]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [Y2008B48, ZR2016BQ41, ZR2019MB064]
  3. Graduate Education Quality Promotion Program of Shandong Province [SDYY18186]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation of Liaocheng University [318011602]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, MnOOH nanohydrangeas and MnOOH nanorods were prepared by a hydrothermal reduction route and used as active anodes for Li-ion batteries. The comparison of their lithium ion energy storage performances showed that gamma-MnOOH nanorods exhibit enhanced cycle and rate capacity, making them a promising candidate for lithium ion battery applications.
In this study, a hydrothermal reduction route was applied for the controlled production of MnOOH nanohydrangeas and MnOOH nanorods. The structure and morphology of the formed products were characterized. Both MnOOH nanohydrangeas and nanorods were utilized as active anodes for Li-ion batteries. Galvanostatic charge-discharge, cyclic voltammogram, rate performance, and electrochemical impedance were analyzed to compare the lithium ion energy storage performances of the two MnOOH nanostructures. The results indicate that gamma-MnOOH nanorods possess enhanced cycle and rate capacity compared with the gamma-MnOOH nanohydrangeas. At a current density of 200 mA g(-1), a specific capacity of 965 mA h g(-1) is obtained for the formed gamma-MnOOH nanorods after 200 cycles, while the reversible capacity of MnOOH nanohydrangeas is 380 mA h g(-1), which suggests that the morphology variation of the as-prepared MnOOH nanostructures can influence the electrochemical properties. gamma-MnOOH nanorods synthesized by this method present a prospective application for lithium ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据