4.7 Article

Biodegradable all polyester-based multiblock copolymer elastomers with controlled properties

期刊

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 1837-1845

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1py00076d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Technology Innovation Program Fund of Kailuan Group
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22071167]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study describes the synthesis of a environmentally-friendly biodegradable all polyester-based thermoplastic elastomer with tunable properties through a cascade polycondensation-coupling ring-opening polymerization (PROP) method. The copolyesters have randomly distributed segments in the main chains and exhibit controlled properties as the feeding content of COBTs increases.
We present here the synthesis of all polyester-based poly(butylene terephthalate)-block-poly(ethylene adipate) segmental multiblock copolymers (mBCPs), (PBT-b-PEA-b-PBT)(n), via a cascade polycondensation-coupling ring-opening polymerization (PROP) method using cyclic oligo(butylene terephthalate)s (COBTs) as monomers and polyethylene adipate (PEA) diol as the macroinitiator. The structure of copolyesters was characterized by H-1 quantitative NMR and H-1-H-1 gCOSY NMR spectroscopy, which reveals the randomly distributed copolyester segments in the main chains as the degree of randomness is equal to 1, arising from the transesterifications during PROP. Further investigations reveal that these segmental multiblock copolymers are elastomers with controlled properties, where the melting point, glass transition temperature (T-g), storage modulus, ratio of the loss modulus to the storage modulus (tan delta) and Young's modulus increase with the increment of the feeding content of COBTs, while the extensibility and biodegradable property decrease vice versa. The developed cascade polymerization method leads to the practical synthesis of environmentally-friendly biodegradable all polyester-based thermoplastic elastomers with tunable properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据