4.6 Article

Perceptual and affective responses to sampled capsaicin differ by reported intake

期刊

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 26-34

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.08.003

关键词

Psychophysics; Generalized scaling; Chemesthesis; Capsaicin; Memory; Chili pepper intake; Personality

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health via an institutional Clinical and Translational Sciences TL1 Predoctoral Fellowship from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [TR000125]
  2. Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (NRSA) F31 Predoctoral Fellowship from the National Institute of Deafness and Communication Disorders [F31DC01465]
  3. United States Department of Agriculture Hatch Project [PEN04565]
  4. Pennsylvania State University
  5. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [TL1TR000125, TL1TR002016, UL1TR002014] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS [F31DC014651] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study was conducted to a) generate suprathreshold dose-response functions for multiple qualities evoked by capsaicin across a wide range of concentrations, and b) revisit how intensity ratings and liking may differ as a function of self reported intake. Individuals rated eight samples of capsaicin for perceived burn and bitterness, as well as disliking/liking. Measures of reported preference for chili peppers, chili intake frequency, prior experience and personality measures were also assessed. Here, we confirm prior findings showing that burn in the laboratory differs with reported chili intake, with infrequent consumers reporting more burn. We extend these findings by exploring how capsaicin perception varies by reported liking, and measures of variety seeking. We also address the question of whether differences in burn ratings may potentially be an artifact of differential scale usage across groups due to prior experience, and not chronic desensitization, as is typically assumed. By using generalized scaling methods and recalled sensations, we conclude the differences observed here and elsewhere are not likely due to differences in how participants use rating scales. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据