4.5 Article

Differential patterns of gray matter volumes and associated gene expression profiles in cognitively-defined Alzheimer's disease subgroups

期刊

NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL
卷 30, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102660

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Gray matter volumes; Gene expression; Heterogeneity; Psychometrics

资金

  1. JPND-funded E-DADS (ZonMW) [733051106]
  2. Spanish Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII-FEDER) [CP19/00031]
  3. NIHR biomedical research center at UCLH [P30AG13846, K23AG046377]
  4. Stichting Alzheimer Nederland
  5. Stichting VUmc fonds
  6. Stichting Dioraphte
  7. [R01 AG 029672]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, differences in regional gray matter volumes and gene expression profiles were compared between cognitively-defined subgroups of individuals with AD, revealing neurobiological distinctions associated with each subgroup's cognitive profile. These findings suggest that distinct biological pathways may contribute to the emergence of cognitive heterogeneity in AD.
The clinical presentation of Alzheimer's disease (AD) varies widely across individuals but the neurobiological mechanisms underlying this heterogeneity are largely unknown. Here, we compared regional gray matter (GM) volumes and associated gene expression profiles between cognitively-defined subgroups of amyloid-beta positive individuals clinically diagnosed with AD dementia (age: 66 +/- 7, 47% male, MMSE: 21 +/- 5). All participants underwent neuropsychological assessment with tests covering memory, executive-functioning, language and visuospatial-functioning domains. Subgroup classification was achieved using a psychometric framework that assesses which cognitive domain shows substantial relative impairment compared to the intra-individual average across domains, which yielded the following subgroups in our sample; AD-Memory (n = 41), AD-Executive (n = 117), AD-Language (n = 33), AD-Visuospatial (n = 171). We performed voxel-wise contrasts of GM volumes derived from 3Tesla structural MRI between subgroups and controls (n = 127, age 58 +/- 9, 42% male, MMSE 29 +/- 1), and observed that differences in regional GM volumes compared to controls closely matched the respective cognitive profiles. Specifically, we detected lower medial temporal lobe GM volumes in AD-Memory, lower fronto-parietal GM volumes in AD-Executive, asymmetric GM volumes in the temporal lobe (left < right) in AD-Language, and lower GM volumes in posterior areas in AD-Visuospatial. In order to examine possible biological drivers of these differences in regional GM volumes, we correlated subgroup-specific regional GM volumes to brain-wide gene expression profiles based on a stereotactic characterization of the transcriptional architecture of the human brain as provided by the Allen human brain atlas. Gene-set enrichment analyses revealed that variations in regional expression of genes involved in processes like mitochondrial respiration and metabolism of proteins were associated with patterns of regional GM volume across multiple subgroups. Other gene expression vs GM volume-associations were only detected in particular subgroups, e.g., genes involved in the cell cycle for AD-Memory, specific sets of genes related to protein metabolism in AD-Language, and genes associated with modification of gene expression in AD-Visuospatial. We conclude that cognitively-defined AD subgroups show neurobiological differences, and distinct biological pathways may be involved in the emergence of these differences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据